bookmark_borderArchives and Indigenous Trauma

Today I listened to a talk by Kirsten Thorpe titled “Critical Librarianship – Indigenous Librarianship”. She brought up a very good point about Indigenous trauma in collections and archives. She said it should be recognised that archives are places of Sorry Business (an Aboriginal term meaning grieving, death, loss, and traumatic events). As such, should also be a trauma-based approach to helping Aboriginal people when navigating this, and workplaces should have special means of support for Aboriginal people. The support that Indigenous people need is different to the standard applied for non-Indigenous people and institutions have to recognise this and educate themselves.

She provided the following resource about supporting Aboriginal people who have been affected by the Stolen Generations:
https://healingfoundation.org.au/

There is also a course by the Australian Society of Archivists called “A Trauma-Informed Approach to Managing Archives”:
https://www.archivists.org.au/events/event/a-trauma-informed-approach-to-managing-archives

bookmark_borderPortrait in Paradox: Commitment and Ambivalence in American Librarianship, 1876-1976

Today I read a journal article from Libri, a journal which has been around since 1950. In Portrait in Paradox: Commitment and Ambivalence in American Librarianship, 1876-1976, Michael H. Harris casts a critical eye on how the government has pressured libraries in a series of moral panics and how librarians have reacted. His goal is to counter the often rosy picture that people have when thinking of libraries in the past. My main takeaway from reading this was that his comments still apply today, as does his rallying cry for librarians. History repeats itself and the way that librarians react to government intervention has alternated between playing it safe and standing their ground. Their ethics and choices have been criticised and held against them, and at times it’s been impossible to win, but the author calls for librarians to stand firm. While the article is about America specifically, other countries can surely relate.

Continue reading “Portrait in Paradox: Commitment and Ambivalence in American Librarianship, 1876-1976”

bookmark_borderOn Preserving Australian First Nations Digital Cultural Heritage

This post is just to share an amazing talk by C. Toby Edgar and Rebecca Barnott-Clement on a project they did which helped a First Nations community digitise their heritage collections. The talk is titled Collaborative models of care: preserving Australian First Nations digital cultural heritage and was the winner of the International Council on Archives Award for Collaboration and Cooperation. The talk was part of the Digital Preservation Coalition’s Digital Preservation Masterclass series.

The project involved going to the Ramingining community in the Northern Territory to work with the Bula’Bula Arts Centre. This talk taught me so much about what it means to truly collaborate with First Nations peoples, and the immense amount of things that we can learn from engaging consistently with their communities. Giving First Nations communities sovereignty over their cultural artifacts is integral to having ethical collections and archives and this talk has some great examples of how to do that.

The talk is only 15 minutes long and I can HIGHLY recommend giving it a listen even if you don’t work in the GLAM (Galleries, Libraries, Archives, and Museums) field.

bookmark_borderKnowledge Creation and False Friendship: Thoughts on “The New Librarianship Field Guide”

I encountered an interesting concept today in reading “The New Librarianship Field Guide” by R. David Lankes. In Chapter 4, “Knowledge Creation”, he discusses the nature of the conversations people have when asking for and receiving information. According to him, there are two types of language classifications when people are seeking to gain knowledge. He calls them “L0” and “L1.” By his definition, L0 is an interaction where one party knows about the subject and the other does not. For instance, I’m in a library and have no idea how to find a book, so I ask the librarian, who is very knowledgeable. He defines L1 as an interaction between two people who are familiar with and have a high level of knowledge about a subject. For instance, I say something to a friend, and he responds with an inside joke, and we then discuss where we might have heard it first.

Continue reading “Knowledge Creation and False Friendship: Thoughts on “The New Librarianship Field Guide””

bookmark_borderOff to the Library Without a Plan

I am very organised when reading and finding new fiction authors. I have a large spreadsheet that lists potential authors to try, with links to their Goodreads ratings and whether I can find them at the library or whether I have to buy them. When I read the author and like them, I start a new tab where I keep track of what I’ve read and my thoughts on their books, colour-coded by whether I’d read it again.

Regarding choosing authors based on reviews, Goodreads has become more and more full of unreliable guff, so I’ve decided to throw that out the window. Where does that leave me? Well, I’ve decided to go against my very anal retentive instincts and rush in headlong without a plan.

Continue reading “Off to the Library Without a Plan”