bookmark_borderEating When You Can’t Eat FODMAPs

I used to be able to eat whatever I wanted, for better or worse. Then over time I started feeling more and more ill until I hit breaking point and had to figure out what was going on. It took a year of elimination dieting to figure out that FODMAPs were the culprit. It’s a collection of food chemicals that are found in various things, and to the layperson there is very little rhyme or reason to what is fine and what isn’t. Thank god for Monash University’s FODMAP app, which became my bible. Some people are only sensitive to some FODMAPs but I’m sensitive to all of them except one. It is very weird that this only came on in my mid-30s, but bizarrely enough the same thing has happened to other members of my family.

It’s easy for someone to take a look at the food list and go “well you can’t eat anything, how can you actually survive”? I love to cook and cook every day. Over the last few years I’ve found plenty of ways to adapt things, and there are plenty of meals that work just fine without onion, garlic, and the other things I must avoid. For instance, I make chicken risotto all the time. I use chicken broth and no wine, and that’s 100% FODMAP free. Parmesan is very low in lactose, so is totally tolerable. Delicious. There are also numerous stir fry recipes that are fine, as long as you leave out veggies that cause issues. I eat meat and fish, so marinades are great for grilled foods. There are quite a lot of things I can still do.

The real problem though is when I’m going out to eat, or going over someone else’s house. It really makes socialising difficult and traveling especially. I have to work with what I’m given, though, and if friends are especially patient they might like the challenge of dealing with my requirements. Others decide it’s all too hard and I can sense that and I just bring my own food. I can’t decide if that bothers me or not, but it puts me in an awkward position where they’ve already invited me over and now I’m making them do extra work. Oh well, it happens.

I guess the takeaway here (lol food pun) is that there are ways around these sorts of things if you get creative. If anyone is dealing FODMAP difficulties or wants some ideas for recipes, I suggest Monash University’s Low FODMAP Cookbook, which can be found at your retailer of choice. I’m still learning and coming up with ways to expand what I can do, but over time it does get more manageable. Just be REALLY careful when you look online for low FODMAP recipes because I swear 90% of them aren’t low FODMAP at all and either the person has a fundamental misunderstanding of what they’re doing, or they’re purposefully adding the term for clicks and have no interest in it whatsoever. I’ve come across so many recipes that could do some real damage.

bookmark_borderLiving History via Antiques Roadshow

I was halfway to a Masters degree in History when I had to bail for financial reasons, but it never stopped me from continuing to study. When I mention this to people, I sometimes get a strong reaction. So many people say they hated studying history because they had some very unsuccessful, draconian high school teacher who made them memorise dates and didn’t make the subject engaging at all. Here is where Antiques Roadshow comes in. I can’t think of a show that interweaves lived experience with history any more than this show that is stereotypically watched by grandmas with a blanket on their lap.

There are things in common with the folks who are on this show. A great many of them have suffered a loss, and are on the show to see what the story is behind a family heirloom. I’ve never inherited anything notable other than a drawer full of my grandpa’s old sketches and art supplies, but I don’t think I’d have the strength to go on national television to talk about it. These are human stories and while the history of inherited objects are discussed, it is interwoven with the emotion involved in receiving the item and the fond attachment people have towards a watch, or a statue, or a painting that has been on the wall for 30 years. Then there are the people who have rock memorabilia, or a dress from the 60s, and they’re showing a passion for history and making it quite clear why these things actually matter.

One can look at this show and go “well that’s materialism”, but what about the other folks who bring in artifacts? There are some problematic ones, especially the white folks who show up with ceremonial swords from the South Pacific and such, but they are objects of significance and societal value. The ancient things someone dug up in their garden show us how we used to live, and all of this is explained in great detail by someone who has more experience than I ever will. There is a passion here, both from the folks who bring in their items, and the people telling them the story.

History is a story, it is made up of people experiencing excitement and great loss. Those unfortunate former students who slogged through some ineffective high school course were unfortunately deprived of the vividness of the people and things who came before us. Maybe they need a blanket, a cup of tea, and an episode of Antiques Roadshow.

bookmark_borderOn Gongoozling

For the purposes of a quick explanation, I just looked up “gongoozling” in the Cambridge Dictionary and the first example sentence is this: “Everyone is entitled to have a weird hobby, such as historical re-enactment or gongoozling (standing and staring at canal activity without participating).” Jeez, way to be judgy there, dictionary. While I don’t technically stand there (Australia has a distinct lack of a canal system), I do sit there and watch any sort of documentary or other related show that I can get my hands on. 99% of this is based in Britain, and I know far more than I am willing to admit about its extensive system. 

One of my favourite shows is Canal Boat Diaries with Robbie Cumming. It follows his life as a person who lives on his canal boat 100% of the time. You get to see his challenges (oops he fell in) but also the beauty of it all. The pace is slow, the scenery is stunning and his enthusiasm is infectious. He makes clearing out a weed hatch into an interesting activity. Another good resource for canal information is a fantastic documentary series with Dan Jones called Building Britain’s Canals. I may have watched it 3 or 4 times now. The gritty and dirty history of Britain’s canal network during the Industrial Revolution, and its ups and downs as it is then converted to a leisure location, is really fascinating to watch. 

Continue reading “On Gongoozling”

bookmark_borderArchives and Indigenous Trauma

Today I listened to a talk by Kirsten Thorpe titled “Critical Librarianship – Indigenous Librarianship”. She brought up a very good point about Indigenous trauma in collections and archives. She said it should be recognised that archives are places of Sorry Business (an Aboriginal term meaning grieving, death, loss, and traumatic events). As such, should also be a trauma-based approach to helping Aboriginal people when navigating this, and workplaces should have special means of support for Aboriginal people. The support that Indigenous people need is different to the standard applied for non-Indigenous people and institutions have to recognise this and educate themselves.

She provided the following resource about supporting Aboriginal people who have been affected by the Stolen Generations:
https://healingfoundation.org.au/

There is also a course by the Australian Society of Archivists called “A Trauma-Informed Approach to Managing Archives”:
https://www.archivists.org.au/events/event/a-trauma-informed-approach-to-managing-archives

bookmark_borderPortrait in Paradox: Commitment and Ambivalence in American Librarianship, 1876-1976

Today I read a journal article from Libri, a journal which has been around since 1950. In Portrait in Paradox: Commitment and Ambivalence in American Librarianship, 1876-1976, Michael H. Harris casts a critical eye on how the government has pressured libraries in a series of moral panics and how librarians have reacted. His goal is to counter the often rosy picture that people have when thinking of libraries in the past. My main takeaway from reading this was that his comments still apply today, as does his rallying cry for librarians. History repeats itself and the way that librarians react to government intervention has alternated between playing it safe and standing their ground. Their ethics and choices have been criticised and held against them, and at times it’s been impossible to win, but the author calls for librarians to stand firm. While the article is about America specifically, other countries can surely relate.

Continue reading “Portrait in Paradox: Commitment and Ambivalence in American Librarianship, 1876-1976”

bookmark_borderOn Archives Having the Power to Boost Marginalized Voices

This post is about TED talk by archivist Dominique Luster and her work to uplift African American voices in historical records that are held by archives. She makes the important point that history is not just a linear recounting of events, it can have bias and re-write peoples’ pasts from a particular person or group’s point of view, essentially erasing marginalised voices.

“The inclusion or exclusion of documents from history making is an expression of power.” – Dominique Luster

She is constructing an archive of works by Pittsburgh journalist Teenie Harris, who, via his articles and photography, documented everyday African American lives from the 1930s-1970s. The archive is being built and described as the community would describe it, using their standards and vocabularies. It’s a short talk, but she has some very important points to make in terms of inclusiveness and bias and it’s well worth a watch.

Continue reading “On Archives Having the Power to Boost Marginalized Voices”

bookmark_borderOn Preserving Australian First Nations Digital Cultural Heritage

This post is just to share an amazing talk by C. Toby Edgar and Rebecca Barnott-Clement on a project they did which helped a First Nations community digitise their heritage collections. The talk is titled Collaborative models of care: preserving Australian First Nations digital cultural heritage and was the winner of the International Council on Archives Award for Collaboration and Cooperation. The talk was part of the Digital Preservation Coalition’s Digital Preservation Masterclass series.

The project involved going to the Ramingining community in the Northern Territory to work with the Bula’Bula Arts Centre. This talk taught me so much about what it means to truly collaborate with First Nations peoples, and the immense amount of things that we can learn from engaging consistently with their communities. Giving First Nations communities sovereignty over their cultural artifacts is integral to having ethical collections and archives and this talk has some great examples of how to do that.

The talk is only 15 minutes long and I can HIGHLY recommend giving it a listen even if you don’t work in the GLAM (Galleries, Libraries, Archives, and Museums) field.

bookmark_borderData or Info: Take Your Pick

Today I read an article titled “On the Difference or Equality of Information, Misinformation, and Disinformation: A Critical Research Perspective” by Bernd Carsten Stahl. There are plenty of deep thinkers out there (too many to name) who contemplate what information is, or what knowledge is, or what data is, essentially going in circles around each other. However Stahl paraphrases another author in a way that I found worth calling out in particular because I have a background dealing with data and website user experience and it gave me pause.

Stahl paraphrases R. T. De George and says “De George (2003) distinguishes between data and information precisely because data contains no claim to truth whereas information does.” I’m not refuting this, but it made me think about my own bias in terms of those 2 terms. Taking that claim at face value, if data makes no claims to truth, that is precisely why I’d trust it more than information*. Let’s look at this example. Imagine I was looking for a house. If I saw a webpage that said “here is information about 123 Smith Street” I’d take that less seriously and expect different things compared to a webpage that says “here is data about 123 Smith Street”. To me, information is an interpretation of data.

Continue reading “Data or Info: Take Your Pick”

bookmark_borderKnowledge Creation and False Friendship: Thoughts on “The New Librarianship Field Guide”

I encountered an interesting concept today in reading “The New Librarianship Field Guide” by R. David Lankes. In Chapter 4, “Knowledge Creation”, he discusses the nature of the conversations people have when asking for and receiving information. According to him, there are two types of language classifications when people are seeking to gain knowledge. He calls them “L0” and “L1.” By his definition, L0 is an interaction where one party knows about the subject and the other does not. For instance, I’m in a library and have no idea how to find a book, so I ask the librarian, who is very knowledgeable. He defines L1 as an interaction between two people who are familiar with and have a high level of knowledge about a subject. For instance, I say something to a friend, and he responds with an inside joke, and we then discuss where we might have heard it first.

Continue reading “Knowledge Creation and False Friendship: Thoughts on “The New Librarianship Field Guide””

bookmark_borderThe Welcome Stench of a Cosy Mystery

I love a good cosy mystery. It’s defined as a mystery without gore or anything particularly triggering. Agatha Christie’s books are a prime example. There is a new crop of current day authors out there writing books based in the 1920s in the same vein as her. In either case, the majority of books are based in beautiful countryside, quaint cottages or stunning manor houses. If it’s in the city, it’s in the clubs and vast apartments of the rich and famous. The trope is well known.

Writers in the past, such as Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Agatha Christie and Margery Allingham, all mention the London fog in their books, but in passing. When characters are in the countryside, mud is mentioned, but nothing that evokes the senses. Some of my favourite current authors who write stories based in the 1920s have the same way of glossing over the grit and grime.

Continue reading “The Welcome Stench of a Cosy Mystery”